Changes to GHC that will expose new packages

[Mark Lentczner]

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, David Terei <davidterei at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Haskeline & terminfo seem like very specific, non-general packages, both
> of
> > which have alternatives. I'm not sure how to think about their inclusion.
>


> What alternatives would you suggest?
>

I wasn't suggesting that you use alternatives, just that alternatives
exist, and hence if HP were to pick a command line input editing package,
for example, it wouldn't be immediately obvious that there was one to pick
above others.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://projects.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-platform/attachments/20120322/fe4d9956/attachment.htm>