Fwd: time in 2009.2.1

[Mikhail Glushenkov]

Hi Duncan,

2009/5/31 Duncan Coutts <duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk>:
> So, I'm more or less convinced that we should just ship time-1.1.2.4.
> For those installers where we include ghc (ie windows atm) I see no
> reason not to remove any existing lib. For the users of the generic
> tarball they'd end up with two versions but that's no great problem.

Then maybe it's better to ship both time-1.1.2.4 and 1.1.3 on Windows too?

> For Windows we start from just the core libs though right? not from ghc
> + extralibs, or am I wrong?

On Windows, GHC installs *some* extralibs, though not all (for
example, html and xhtml are included, but not fgl or OpenGL).

--
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments



-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments