Preview of XHTML, CSS style-able Haddock output
Simon Marlow
marlowsd at gmail.com
Mon Jul 19 04:34:46 EDT 2010
On 19/07/2010 08:22, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> Friends -
>
> Take a gander at:
>
> http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/index.html -single page
> version- or http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/frames.html
> -frame version-
>
> Notice the style switcher menu on the top right... :-) Now poke
> around those pages...
>
> I've completely revamped the backend over the last few months and now
> it produces 100% validating XHTML with "semantic markup". All styling
> is done in the CSS. This makes the pages smaller, style-able, and
> quite a bit more scrape-able.
>
> For the Tibbe and Snappy themes, I cribbed from Johan's example page
> in Trac #108, and from the Snap web site. You should be able to
> easily grab the css and see how they are put together and start
> playing with them or a create a new theme if you want.
>
> Looking forward to finding out what you think.
I think the semantic markup approach is wonderful. Some thoughts about
the styles themselves:
- like the smaller fonts in Tibbe, but I prefer to use
monospaced font for code
- like the contents from Tibbe
- Tibbe: underlining links in code is too busy, and where
they aren't underlined the blue is too bright
- Both: hide the synoposis by default
- Tibbe: I like the outlined code blocks, but would prefer
the type signatures etc. to have a different-coloured background,
I think it helps to visually grok the page more quickly.
- Snappy: section headings don't stand out quite as much as Tibbe
- Snappy: don't like the font used for text: too bold and too serify.
- Snappy: like the narrower page width.
- Snappy: text in the header is too big and bold
- Snappy: grey box around type signatures seems slightly too tall.
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Haddock
mailing list