[haskell-llvm] Looking to transition maintainership of the llvm package(s)

[Henning Thielemann]

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, Benjamin Saunders wrote:

> Perhaps your work there would be a good basis for us to move forward 
> from? It seems to me that the biggest immediate challenge to us will be 
> reconciling all the forks, and if you've got that already well in hand, 
> we could save a lot of time.

It can become a lot of work. My switch to type families affected many 
type signatures. As far as I have seen, examples were broken in some of 
the llvm forks.