2013.4.0.0 proposal - getting to alpha

Carter Schonwald carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 08:32:29 GMT 2013


ghc doesn't actually depend on anything in the cabal api, merely ghc and
cabal share some bits related to manipulating the package data base (I
forget the details). So should be completely straightforward to do a test
build with 1.18 instead



On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Jens Petersen
<juhp at community.haskell.org>wrote:

> On 26 November 2013 17:18, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> or just build ghc with the 1.18 cabal and keep it all the same :)
>>
>
> Has it been tried? :)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://projects.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-platform/attachments/20131126/a90e4d99/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Haskell-platform mailing list