Haskell Platform 2013.2 Proposal Status
Carter Schonwald
carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Sun Apr 14 22:29:49 BST 2013
Did anyone spend time trying to identify / bisect when the bug was fixed
between 7.6.2 and ghc head? (and backport the logic to resolve it)
would be a shame to not have the next haskell platform use 7.6 ...
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma at ro-che.info> wrote:
> * Christian Maeder <Christian.Maeder at dfki.de> [2013-04-12 11:26:25+0200]
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just spoiled my day by http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7748
> > with ghc-7.6.2 in our large project:
> >
> > hets: <<loop>>
> >
> > hets works fine with ghc-7.6.1 (and older versions). I haven't
> > located the error yet, though.
> >
> > Yet, I therefore conclude, GHC 7.6.2 ist not suited for the official HP.
>
> I don't think this is enough data to make such a conclusion.
> GHC 7.6.2 may have fixes for bugs that are present in GHC 7.6.1, for
> example.
>
> So we need to compare the fixed bugs versus regressions in 7.6.2 to make
> the choice.
>
> (OTOH, the looping bug is a nasty one, if you ask me, and is difficult
> to debug.)
>
> Roman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://projects.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-platform/attachments/20130414/48441c73/attachment.htm>
More information about the Haskell-platform
mailing list