Changes to GHC that will expose new packages

[Ian Lynagh]

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:46:30AM -0700, Johan Tibell wrote:
> 
> Perhaps GHC should have
> it's own private package database where it register dependencies
> needed by the ghc and ghci packages?

But those packages are public.

Putting them in a different database would just make it more likely that
people will end up with multiple versions, which is best avoided
wherever possible.


Thanks
Ian