[haskell-llvm] Int instead of CInt in FFI (Was: Upcoming release, high level binding state)

[Henning Thielemann]

On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Benjamin Saunders wrote:

> Nonetheless, I'd like to proceed with a Hackage release for at least 
> llvm-base and llvm-wrapper soon, and the build blocker in the latest 
> high-level bindings release suggests it would be better than not to push 
> that as well. Is there any release procedure beyond the obvious 
> tag-and-upload-to-hackage I should be aware of? Should I await review, 
> or is it appropriate for me to proceed once I judge that a release is 
> ready?

Recently I asked why CInt values in the FFI were replaced by Int, because 
I think this is not correct. I got no answer so far. This should have been 
clarified before a hackage release.

I just stumbled again about an Int result of LLVMCmpInstGetPredicate where 
I think this is not correct.