[haskell-llvm] llvm-general FFI dependencies

[Henning Thielemann]

Am 20.08.2013 01:37, schrieb Benjamin Scarlet:

> It's okay to put the data type into llvm-general-pure, as it's pure
> Haskell - not dependent on any FFI.
> It's weird to put it in llvm-general-pure, because it's not of much
> external use at runtime except to pass to code in llvm-general.
> It's weird to put it in llvm-general-ffi, because it's not FFI code.

If it does not fit in either package, could it be put into a separate 
package?

Btw. if the FFI package should be used widely I prefer it would not 
depend on so many GHC extensions like TemplateHaskell.