[haskell-llvm] Maintainership still ongoing?

[Henning Thielemann]

Am 12.08.2013 17:51, schrieb Scott West:

> It seems that the FFI isn't even exposed in llvm-general, what if that's
> all I want to use?
>
> I think you're going to face a hard sell telling people to switch to
> llvm-general; it's not exactly a replacement for llvm-base.
>
> I think the optimal solution would be to find a way for llvm-general to
> use llvm-base for its FFI (not the AST part of course). I'd be willing
> to help integrate the improvements on the FFI side into llvm-base, if
> they are portable. If we can find a way to cooperate here I think it
> will benefit everyone in the long run :).

I proposed splitting of llvm/llvm-base into three packages, and I think 
llvm-general-pure and llvm-general could complement the split packages 
and use the llvm-ffi:

https://github.com/bos/llvm/issues/60
https://github.com/bos/llvm/issues/61