Graph.Tree vs Graph.PatriciaTree
jrm8005 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 10:03:39 EST 2010
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Alp Mestanogullari <alpmestan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Indeed, but IIRC, it's more about space profiling, whereas Thomas seems to
> be focusing on time performances for the moment.
Good to know.
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Jorden Mauro <jrm8005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is a profiler that comes with GHC, too.
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Thomas Bereknyei <tomberek at gmail.com>
>> > For 10000 steps of 23 sigmoid neurons I unscientifically tested and
>> > found that the PatriciaTree version takes half the time.
>> > Is there an easy way to time things in Haskell?
>> > -Tom
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Hnn mailing list
>> > Hnn at projects.haskell.org
>> > http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hnn
>> Hnn mailing list
>> Hnn at projects.haskell.org
> Alp Mestanogullari
More information about the Hnn