[haskell-llvm] 3.2.0.0 released

[Carter Schonwald]

on a related note:
one thing I noticed is that we currently don't have a test suite that can
actually be run, we just have examples. Perhaps its worth doing some leg
work to have those examples constitute a unit testing suite?

i won't have time for a few days, but if other folks are game i'm up for
helping out trying to do that...


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Henning Thielemann <
lemming at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:

>
> On Sat, 11 May 2013, Benjamin Saunders wrote:
>
>  llvm-base and llvm 3.2.0.0 are now available on hackage. This release
>> builds against LLVM 3.2.
>>
>
> I have again trouble with installing llvm-base. The generated package info
> contains a reference to both LLVM-2.8 and LLVM-3.2 library. After having
> fixed manually I can run LLVM code from GHCi, but compiled programs using
> LLVM crash.
>  The configure procedure was always fragile and seems to remain fragile.
> :-( I would prefer to use the pkg-config technique but the LLVM developers
> do not seem to care about:
>    http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.**cgi?id=9405<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9405>
>
> I waste hours after hours for getting every new version of LLVM to work
> with Haskell. I am wondering how to cope with that situation in the future.
> Would it make sense if we write our own .pc files and use them for building
> llvm-base with cabal and without 'configure'?
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Haskell-llvm mailing list
> Haskell-llvm at projects.haskell.**org <Haskell-llvm at projects.haskell.org>
> http://projects.haskell.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**haskell-llvm<http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-llvm>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://projects.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-llvm/attachments/20130515/7e4887a8/attachment.htm>