[haskell-llvm] Int instead of CInt in FFI (Was: Upcoming release, high level binding state)

Nathan Howell nathan.d.howell at gmail.com
Wed May 15 16:00:37 BST 2013


If you run across these, please send a pull request (or mail a patch) with
a fix.

thanks,
-n


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Henning Thielemann <
lemming at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:

>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Benjamin Saunders wrote:
>
>  Nonetheless, I'd like to proceed with a Hackage release for at least
>> llvm-base and llvm-wrapper soon, and the build blocker in the latest
>> high-level bindings release suggests it would be better than not to push
>> that as well. Is there any release procedure beyond the obvious
>> tag-and-upload-to-hackage I should be aware of? Should I await review, or
>> is it appropriate for me to proceed once I judge that a release is ready?
>>
>
> Recently I asked why CInt values in the FFI were replaced by Int, because
> I think this is not correct. I got no answer so far. This should have been
> clarified before a hackage release.
>
> I just stumbled again about an Int result of LLVMCmpInstGetPredicate where
> I think this is not correct.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Haskell-llvm mailing list
> Haskell-llvm at projects.haskell.**org <Haskell-llvm at projects.haskell.org>
> http://projects.haskell.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**haskell-llvm<http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-llvm>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://projects.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-llvm/attachments/20130515/1d8ee6d9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Haskell-llvm mailing list