[haskell-llvm] Maintainership still ongoing?

Scott West scott.west at inf.ethz.ch
Mon Aug 12 16:55:18 BST 2013


Good to know! I have a few projects that use llvm-base so I'm generally 
happy to help in the maintenance, if there's anything I can do let me know!

Regards,
Scott

On 12/08/13 17:28, Nathan Howell wrote:
> I'm still using llvm/llvm-base. Just been catching up on some much
> needed vacationing and have a queue of maintenance work to get to still.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Carter Schonwald
> <carter.schonwald at gmail.com <mailto:carter.schonwald at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hey Scott,
>
>     Llvm-general has a better ffi story than llvm/llvm-base.  And
>     provides a nice way to map  back and forth between the Haskell AST
>     and the llvm c++ in memory AST.  It's really a markedly better
>     substrate. And there's no cruft in its build scripting!
>
>     If you'd like to ask folks about the llvm-general  bindings, the
>     #haskell-llvm irc channel on freenode is the way to go.
>
>     I'm not the right person to ask about the old llvm lib, hopefully
>     someone else can chime in.
>
>     Cheers
>
>     -carter
>
>
>
>
>
>     On Monday, August 12, 2013, Scott West wrote:
>
>         Hello all,
>
>         I recently submitted a pull request to fix a build problem for
>         llvm-base
>         (it assumed that both shared and static libraries were always
>         installed
>         together, which is common but not always the case).
>
>         Upon checking on its status I noticed another bug report
>         (https://github.com/bos/llvm/issues/71) that basically had a
>         response
>         that said the project was no longer actively maintained, and
>         that you
>         should migrate to the new hotness.
>
>         Apparently the new hotness is llvm-general, which is fine, but:
>
>         Is anyone taking pull requests/merges for llvm-base?
>
>         If not, who can I ask for commit access so I can take some of
>         it, bos?
>
>         Why doesn't the new hotness at least use llvm-base for its FFI
>         stuff?
>
>         Thanks for any information!
>
>         Regards,
>         Scott
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Haskell-llvm mailing list
>         Haskell-llvm at projects.haskell.org
>         http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-llvm
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Haskell-llvm mailing list
>     Haskell-llvm at projects.haskell.org
>     <mailto:Haskell-llvm at projects.haskell.org>
>     http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-llvm
>
>




More information about the Haskell-llvm mailing list