[diagrams] diagrams status

Brent Yorgey byorgey at seas.upenn.edu
Fri Aug 20 12:44:21 EDT 2010

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 05:39:17PM +0100, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Ryan Yates wrote:
> > explicitly set normals.  I searched around some and found [1] which uses the
> > transpose of the inverse of the transformation.  I haven't had time to work
> >  up any tests but we *could* get the transpose by converting to a matrix
> > (transform with each basis vector to get the matrix) and then transposing
> > that but it seems like it would be pretty ugly and I don't know if that
> Interesting, I look forward to hearing more.  Yes, getting a matrix
> out can be done but it is a bit ugly.

Of course, we could also just keep the inverse transpose around just
like we keep the inverse around, then no matrices would be necessary.


More information about the diagrams mailing list